Thu 10 Aug 2006
IBM Snaps up FileNet too
Posted by Greg under Acquisitions, News
Today IBM announced that they were acquiring FileNet Corporation for $1.6 Billion. IBM hadn’t signaled that there would be this kind of acquisition activity on the horizon. This is IBM’s third acquisition in 2 weeks. IBM’s software group has bought more than 50 companies in the past 10 years, and this is IBM’s largest purchase in more than 4 years (since they bought Rational).
(edit 9/13/2006 - I decided that rather than read my post, you’d be better served checkin out Sandy Kemsley’s post on the acquisition. It’s easy to read and very exhaustive.)
Russ Statler, who on his blog gave this explanation of IBM’s ECM software:
Right now the IBM ECM offering is still many moving pieces that have been picked up by acquisition and still have not been completely absorbed or integrated into a cohesive single architecture. Adding FileNET to this mix will only prolong this effort and make thing more complex thereby adding to the implementation costs for customers.
Bottom line: I do not think this will make ECM better for FileNET customers and the value to IBM customers is questionable.
I tend to agree with that assessment, though if IBM didn’t snap them up, someone would have. I think IBM is buying marketshare and credibility as much as technology. In that respect I’m in no position to assess whether the move was right or not. I suppose time will tell. An analyst for JP Morgan told marketwatch that he thought the deal made strategic sense and that the price was fair.
Stats:
Price: ~ $1,600,000,000
Premium over market: ~ $150,000,000
Deal Closing Date: Q4 2006
FileNet 2005 ECM sales: $160 million (total revenue of 422 million also includes customer support and services income)
IBM 2005 ECM sales: $291 million
EMC 2005 ECM sales: $362 million
IBM / FileNet Combined: $451 million, retaking the #1 market position
Noteworthy:
FileNet shares are trading several percent above the $35 sale price, indicating that some people are expecting a higher offer.
UPDATE: 8/11/2006 - Businessweek has a good article about IBM’s shopping spree and the battle for most-valuable-software-provider status. Of note, it mentions some possible reasons for the buy (competitive advantage vs. Indian Outsourcing and adding more value than EMC could)
Tags:emc, filenet, ibm3 Responses to “ IBM Snaps up FileNet too ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Internet Security Systems falls prey to IBM acquisition fervor » IBM Eye
August 23rd, 2006 at 11:47 am[…] The sales force is likely duplicative, though experienced technical salespeople with deep relationships at big clients are worth keeping even if they overlap. I just can’t see how IBM will be able to bill for these new assets other than by charging for the software. If that’s the case; if IBM just paid $1.3 Billion for a product producing $40 million / year in profits, IBM has lost its sense. A few posts ago, I mentioned how the IBM ECM offering is a bunch of moving pieces picked up by acquisition but not fully absorbed or integrated into a cohesive single architecture. Perhaps IBM has a plan for where they want to be and feel as though they need to get there immediately before some major shift or potential sustainable competitive advantage is lost. I’ve not heard mention of any such strategy. The impression I’m getting is that IBM is going in too many directions and is committed to generalities and big picture goals but not specific execution. By this time next year we should know, and I hope to be proven wrong. […]
-
Pingback from Should IBM Buy Cognos? » IBM Eye
March 2nd, 2007 at 12:53 pm[…] I’ve been pondering for sometime about a future hookup of IBM and Cognos. Motley Fool talked about it maybe six months ago and IBM’s appetite seemed insatiable around that time. This announcement (IBM to use Cognos as its embedded workforce performance reporting and analysis engine) makes that more likely I suppose. There are only three BI players out there and Hyperion was snapped up by Oracle earlier this week. And then there were two. IBM doesn’t really have a relationship with Business Objects and they are increasingly wed to Cognos and BI is increasingly important (at least in the eyes of tech buyers). I’ve looked at IBM’s acquisitions over the past months, and they are all companies that IBM knew well from these sorts of partnerships. But, they also were all (excepting ISS $ Filenet) on the small side, giving IBM the beer-goggled belief that they could add value through the purchase with their legion of sales folks and solid reputation. (I ought to disclose that I am of the opinion that most acquisitions are the result of upper management sitting around in some meeting trying to come up with something clever to do to look productive. The other acquisitions happen because someone lost a bet I guess.) […]
August 10th, 2006 at 4:10 pm
Wow, this is great news. IBM is on a shopping spree.